Software Patents
(Question 29~33) Question 29. Is there protection available for software patents? Answer: Yes. ¡@ |
Question 30.
If protection is available for software patents, what subject matter is
allowable (e.g. post processing result, etc.)? Are there any particular
claim-drafting formats that are preferred? If so, are there any
available examples of accepted claim language? ¡@ |
Question 31.
What is the average amount of time necessary to secure a software patent
as opposed to an electrical (hardware based) patent? ¡@ |
Question 32. If software patents are not allowed, are there acceptable work-arounds? For example, in the U.S., the following is an acceptable claim "A computer-readable storage medium storing a set of instructions for execution by a general purpose computer to [do something], the set of instructions comprising:" [recite "code segments", each code segment having a different function]. Answer: The forbidden one is "A computer program comprising:" since it is held that a computer program should be protected under the copyright law. ¡@ |
Question 33. What is the standard for patentability (e.g. obviousness, problem-solution, advantageous effect)? Answer: The standard for patentability for software patents still includes novelty, non-obviousness and utility. ¡@ |
Expedited
Prosecution (Question
34~38) Question 34. Are there procedures in your country available for expediting prosecution? Answer: Yes. ¡@ |
Question 35. If so, what are the costs and procedures required? Answer: Our service fees depend on how lengthy the evidencing paper is. Since expediting prosecution applies to the published application only, we need to petition an early earlier publication by paying the official fee NT$1,000 (US$33) if the expedited prosecution is desired at an early stage immediately after filing a patent application. Our service fees for petitioning an early earlier publication will normally be NT$3,000. ¡@ |
Question 36. Is expedited prosecution limited to certain situations and/or types of technology?
Answer: Article 39 provides for Preferential Examination
as follows: ¡@ |
Question 37. What are the potential disadvantages? Answer: There is no predicted or detectable disadvantage. ¡@ |
Question 38. Do you believe that requesting expedited prosecution is worthwhile? Answer: If an earlier patent is desired or really necessary, it certainly is worthwhile. ¡@ |